Fun times with RFCs -- was Re: Wireless Masochism
Michael L Torrie
torriem at chem.byu.edu
Tue Jul 5 15:56:32 MDT 2005
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 15:48 -0600, Gabriel Gunderson wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 15:40 -0600, Mitch Anderson wrote:
> > RFC 2136 explains it fully
> This is bad. We have gone from "RTFM (Read The Fine Manual)" to "RTRFC
> (Read The RFC)".
Having spent many hours reading the RFCs defining the LDAPv3 wire
protocol, and then implementing C code to speak the said protocol, I can
say that RFCs are actually not that hard to read and do contain a wealth
of information. It would just be nice if everyone followed them, rather
than taking so many short cuts. I'd cite Microsoft as a prime example
of this, but my project only implemented two thirds of the LDAPv3
standard, just enough to function. So I can't really talk. :)
> Where do the lazy go?
Hmm. Just keep posting to the plug list I guess!
> | This has been a P.L.U.G. mailing. |
> | Don't Fear the Penguin. |
> | IRC: #utah at irc.freenode.net |
More information about the PLUG