gabe at gundy.org
Tue Jul 5 15:41:30 MDT 2005
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 15:25 -0600, Andrew McNabb wrote:
> However, Hans also said that it tap can be faster than tun. I have a
> hard time seeing that, since tun would avoid ARP packets and other
> such chatty packets which are commonly found on a subnet. Why would
> tap be faster than tun? Are there other factors?
I don't know if by "faster" you mean "more efficient". This would seem
to indicate otherwise...
"Overall, routing is probably a better choice for most people, as it is
more efficient and easier to set up (as far as the OpenVPN configuration
itself) than bridging."
More information about the PLUG