Does this belong here?
hans at fugal.net
Tue Jul 5 13:45:47 MDT 2005
I got about halfway before the one in me couldn't stand the
pitiful formatting resulting from someone not wrapping at <80 chars
somewhere along the line.
I'm sure the second half was as funny as the first though, and this just
proves that it applies to posting jokes as well as changing light bulbs.
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005 at 13:34 -0600, Adam Peterson wrote:
> How many list members does it takes to change a light bulb?
> One to change the light bulb and to post that the light bulb has been
> Fourteen to share similar experiences of changing light bulbs and how the
> bulb could have been changed differently.
> Seven to caution about the dangers of changing light bulbs.
> Seven more to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts about changing
> light bulbs.
> Five to flame the spell checkers.
> Three to correct spelling/grammar flames.
> Six to argue over whether it's "lightbulb" or "light bulb" .. another six
> to condemn those six
> as stupid.
> Fifteen to claim experience in the lighting industry and give the correct
> Nineteen to post that this group is not about light bulbs and to please
> take this discussion to
> a lightbulb (or light bulb) forum.
> Eleven to defend the posting to the group saying that we all use light
> bulbs and therefore the
> posts are relevant to this group.
> Thirty six to debate which method of changing light bulbs is superior,
> where to buy the best
> light bulbs, what brand of light bulbs work best for this technique and
> what brands are faulty
> Seven to post URLs where one can see examples of different light bulbs.
> Four to post that the URLs were posted incorrectly and then post the
> corrected URL.
> Three to post about links they found from the URLs that are relevant to
> this group which makes
> light bulbs relevant to this group.
> Thirteen to link all posts to date, quote them in their entirety including
> all headers and
> signatures, and add "Me too"
> Five to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot
> handle the light
> bulb controversy.
> Four to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?"
> Thirteen to say "do a Google search on light bulbs before posting questions
> about light bulbs"
> Three to tell a funny story about their show dog and a light bulb. AND One
> group lurker to
> respond to the original post 6 months from now and start it all over again.
> | This has been a P.L.U.G. mailing. |
> | Don't Fear the Penguin. |
> | IRC: #utah at irc.freenode.net |
.O. Hans Fugal | De gustibus non disputandum est.
..O http://hans.fugal.net | Debian, vim, mutt, ruby, text, gpg
OOO | WindowMaker, gaim, UTF-8, RISC, JS Bach
GnuPG Fingerprint: 6940 87C5 6610 567F 1E95 CB5E FC98 E8CD E0AA D460
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://plug.org/pipermail/plug/attachments/20050705/f4f0f4a7/attachment.bin
More information about the PLUG