jcoates at archive.org
Thu Feb 3 11:45:00 MST 2005
>So if someone is on a drug and committing a crime, the drug is more likely
to be marijuana than crack.
yep - i would venture to guess that that's probably true.
>It doesn't necessarily mean that using marijuana makes a person more likely
to commit other crimes.
well, i think this is where there may be some correlation.
try this out:
replace: "under the influence of marijauna"
with: "under the influence of alcohol"
replace: "during the commission of their crime"
with: "involved in a fatal auto accident"
then it would seem to indicate that you are more likely to be killed in auto
accident if you are drunk. drunk people are impaired, physically and
mentally, and so "mistakes" happen when operating heavy machinery (ie. a
i think this just says "if you are high, you are more likely to be convicted
of a crime." toasty people are impaired mentally, and perhaps exercise poor
judgement and impulse control, and so "mistakes" happen when trying to
From: plug-bounces at plug.org [mailto:plug-bounces at plug.org]On Behalf Of
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 11:27 AM
To: Provo Linux Users Group Mailing List
Subject: Re: Utah Politics/Region
Josh Coates wrote:
> on pot..
> a 1998 study done by the National Institute of Justice found that out of
> convicts that were under the influence of drugs during the comission of
> their crime, approximately 18.5% were under the influence of marijuana,
> 15.2% were under the influence of cocaine or crack, and 5.6% were under
> influence of heroin.
> note that the study didnt indicate whether or not the crime was violent or
> not - but it's interesting that folks high on marijuana seem to be
> committing (or at least getting convicted of) more crime than folks high
> Josh Coates
That is interesting, but if I had to take a stab at it, I would guess
that those numbers are so simply because marijuana is more commonly used
than crack. So if someone is on a drug and committing a crime, the drug
is more likely to be marijuana than crack. It doesn't necessarily mean
that using marijuana makes a person more likely to commit other crimes.
I could be wrong though.
Everyone here has anecdotal evidence and life experiences. Jayce,
Sasha, me, everybody. Sasha might not know any responsible drinkers, I
do. Jayce knows some violent potheads, I don't. I felt compelled to
"defend" drinkers in the first place because I personally know many
people who enjoy drinking, who do not drive drunk or abuse their
families. It is a person's right to avoid a store that sells alcohol
and I don't have a problem with it, but I thought the generalizations
about drinkers and alcohol in general were ignorant and unfair and I
just felt urged to respond.
It's been interesting to see the variety opinions in this thread, and I
am glad the PLUG list tolerates an off-topic tangent now and then. I've
read this list for a while and I think it's great, but I have made very
few posts here however since I live in SLC, and I'm just naturally more
of a lurker than an active poster type. I was worried that I would get
flamed for my first post, and I immediately regretted sending it, but
I'm glad that it turned out ok.
| This has been a P.L.U.G. mailing. |
| Don't Fear the Penguin. |
| IRC: #utah at irc.freenode.net |
More information about the PLUG