jcoates at archive.org
Wed Feb 2 19:04:56 MST 2005
>However, we should be very careful to avoid promoting litigation that
>interferes with other people's religious practices.
i assume you mean legislation (shoot me now if i am promoting litigation!!)
>If you are LDS and insensitive to other people's beliefs, you're either
extremely inconsistent (that's the nice word for it),
>or else your views on LDS history are very unorthodox.
my observations aren't really in the context of LDS beliefs or history, but
they certainly could be put there w/o any problems.
the idea is: no matter what moral code a society lives by, this moral code
will be translated into legislation.
when you have a society made up of diverse groups, and hence, a diverse
group of moral codes, then you may have diverse moral codes competing for
like it or not, that's just the way it is.
of course, this looks good on paper, but in practice you have lots of other
factors involved in passing legislation - for instance, money and politics.
one could argue that neither money nor politics advance a moral code (or if
they do, then it's one that is at odds with most traditional moral codes)
and so this 'corrupts' the over-simplified "society makes laws based on
their morals" rule.
so, no - i don't think it's hypocritcal to make this kind of observation.
my sensitivity to others beliefs only matters in the context of the society
that is made up of diverse moral codes - and note that my moral code may (or
may not) be mutually exclusive with anothers moral code: enter the
whew, good thing we changed the subject on this thread! ;-)
From: plug-bounces at plug.org [mailto:plug-bounces at plug.org]On Behalf Of
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 4:48 PM
To: Provo Linux Users Group Mailing List
Subject: Re: Utah Politics/Region
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 03:01:49PM -0700, Josh Coates wrote:
> some thoughts on utah religion/politics:
> * ALL state/federal laws are based on arbitrary values of "right and
> (ie. morals)
> * Many people base their morals on judeo-christian doctrine - many base
> their morals on non-religious doctrine.
> * The belief in an inherent "spiritual" agency doesn't mean you can't
> strongly discourage people from doing things you think are "wrong" by
> legislating laws against it. (Think about it - ALL laws work this way, in
> EVERY part of the country.)
A lot of your thoughts (including the bad effects of alcohol) are very
interesting, and I agree that alcohol causes a lot of problems.
However, we should be very careful to avoid promoting litigation that
interferes with other people's religious practices. If you are LDS and
insensitive to other people's beliefs, you're either extremely
inconsistent (that's the nice word for it), or else your views on LDS
history are very unorthodox. If the latter case is true, power to you.
Though I may not agree with your take on the persecutions of the last
almost-200 years, I'd love to hear them. But in any case it is my
opinion that we should try to be sensitive to others' beliefs.
PGP Fingerprint: 8A17 B57C 6879 1863 DE55 8012 AB4D 6098 8826 6868
More information about the PLUG