Raid 5

[Tyler Strickland]

On 12/02/2005 02:07 PM, Tyler Strickland wrote:
> On 12/02/2005 01:57 PM, Nicholas Leippe wrote:
> 
>> If you consider as I do, that the first drive failure is a given,
>> then the odds of failure is magnitudes larger--back up to the same order
>> of magnitude as a single drive failing.

On another side note, if you take the first drive failure as a given, 
RAID 5 degraded = RAID 0, and we know how much we like RAID 0 in 
servers... :)

--Tyler