tyler at tylers.org
Fri Dec 2 14:07:34 MST 2005
On 12/02/2005 01:57 PM, Nicholas Leippe wrote:
> If you consider as I do, that the first drive failure is a given,
> then the odds of failure is magnitudes larger--back up to the same order
> of magnitude as a single drive failing.
> This makes the relative differences in failure odds become significant,
> especially when you consider how the odds increase with additional capacity.
What you say is true about the probability increasing with a failed
drive. The probability of two drives failing at once is very small, but
the probability of a second drive failure after the first has occurred
is much larger. RAID 10 can, in most cases, survive multiple failures,
while a RAID 5 cannot. So our lesson for today, kids, is "Always fix
your degraded array as quickly as possible."
As a related side note, hot spares are a wonderful thing...
More information about the PLUG