sjansen at buscaluz.org
Fri Aug 12 11:58:53 MDT 2005
On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 10:12 -0700, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> - some languages are better for specific purposes (e.g. erlang and
And manipulation of binary data. Erlang was obviously not designed to
deal with strings.
> - some languages are better generalists than others, too
> Perl is a good awk + sed replacement. The problem is when people start
> using it as a generalist language because they don't know better.
Show me a good generalist language. I'd argue that for one of the most
common operations today, Perl is hands down the winner: string
Stuart Jansen e-mail/jabber: sjansen at buscaluz.org
"XML is like violence: if it doesn't solve your problem, you aren't
using enough of it." - Chris Maden
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://plug.org/pipermail/plug/attachments/20050812/eb369cd2/attachment.bin
More information about the PLUG